Retail & ShopifyProvider-reported case

ZOX

US · Reported by Tapcart

  • 40%repeat customer rate through app
  • 17,000+push subscribers

What was reported

ZOX recorded repeat purchasing through its mobile commerce app.

Mechanisms in the external example

  • Shopify
  • Push
  • Online shop

These describe the external business’s setup. They are not a list of guaranteed AppBuild features or integrations.

How to interpret it

A 40% repeat rate is not a 40% increase. The repeat-rate cohort definition is not fully disclosed.

Provider-reported cases are selected success stories and are not controlled experiments. First-party provider case or customer statement; a selected success story, generally not independently audited. Individual results vary.

The source does not isolate the effect of an app alone.

Artwork for this record

ZOX: 40% repeat customer rate through app. A 40% repeat rate is not a 40% increase. The repeat-rate cohort definition is not fully disclosed.

Use these graphics in presentations, proposals or social posts. Keep the source and context intact. The businesses shown are external examples, and their results are not guaranteed.

Related records

Shared mechanisms only. Results from different businesses are never combined or averaged.

Retail & ShopifyProvider-reported case

The Oodie

+37% app average order value vs web

The Oodie’s app channel showed higher order value and merchandise value per session than web.

Context: Channel comparison; loyal shoppers self-select into apps. Source conflicts on conversion rate (134%/135%); that metric is excluded.

Garden & plant retailProvider-reported case

BWH Plant Co

56% online DTC revenue through app

BWH Plant Co reports that its app became a major direct-to-consumer sales channel.

Context: Revenue share is not new revenue. The reported 97% retention figure is omitted because its definition and window are unclear.

Specialist retailProvider-reported case

Type One Style

+42% app average order value vs website

Type One Style reports stronger shopping metrics for its app channel.

Context: Selling diabetes-device accessories is retail evidence, not evidence of improved clinical outcomes. Channel selection bias applies.